English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23401691      Online Users : 108
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100014

    Title: The Constituency of Classifier Constructions in Mandarin Chinese
    Other Titles: 漢語單位詞結構的句法成分分析
    Authors: 張寧
    Zhang, Niina Ning
    Keywords: 單位詞;量詞;句法成分;左分枝;右分枝;漢語
    Date: 2011-06
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 11:39:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由數詞,單位詞,及名詞構成的短語可分析為三種句法結構:容器單位詞,度量單位詞,部分單位詞及群體單位詞出現在左分枝結構中,個體單位詞及個體化單位詞出現在右分枝結構中,種類單位詞出現在延伸式右分枝結構中。此結論由以下考慮得出:左邊緣修飾語的轄域;單位詞的修飾語與名詞的修飾語之間的依存關係;數詞與單位詞的合成體之可能的句法功能;以及單位詞對名詞的語意選擇。本文指出數詞與單位詞的共現以及“多”及“半”的位置都無法證明數詞與單位詞是否構成一個句法成分。而且左右分枝與數量語義及個體語義無對應關係。此外,本文認為單位詞後帶“的”的結構有可能是比較句的省略句式,所以“的”的位置並不一定標示句法成分的分界處。
    This paper examines the constituency of the construction that contains three elements: a numeral, a word that encodes a counting unit, such as a classifier or measure word, and a noun in Mandarin Chinese. It identifies three structures: a left-branching structure for container measures, standard measures, partitive classifiers, and collective classifiers; a right-branching structure for individual and individuating classifiers; and a structure in which no two of the three elements form a constituent, for kind classifiers. The identification is based on the investigation of four issues: <i> the scope of a left-peripheral modifier; <ii> the dependency between the modifier of unit word and that of a noun; <iii> the complement and predicate status of the combination of a numeral and a unit word; <iv> the semantic selection relation between a unit word and a noun. The paper also shows that the co-occurrence of a numeral and a unit word and the position of certain partitive markers are not reliable in identifying syntactic constituents. It also argues against quantity-individual semantic mappings with different syntactic structures. Finally, the paper presents a comparative deletion analysis of the constructions in which the functional word de follows a unit word.
    Relation: 臺灣語言學期刊, 9(1), 1-50
    Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2011.9(1).1
    DOI: 10.6519/TJL.2011.9(1).1
    Appears in Collections:[台灣語言學期刊 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    9(1)-1-50.pdf2847KbAdobe PDF427View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback