English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88531/118073 (75%)
Visitors : 23457022      Online Users : 46
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 俄羅斯學報 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/100898
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100898


    Title: 俄羅斯貨幣政策操作工具與操作目標間關係
    Other Titles: The relationship between Russian monetary instruments and targets
    Authors: 汪哲仁
    Wang, Che-Jen
    Keywords: 俄羅斯;貨幣政策工具;VAR/VECM模型;Granger因果關係
    Russia;Monetary Policy Instruments;VAR/VECM;Granger Causality
    Date: 2008-12
    Issue Date: 2016-08-30 14:46:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自1998年金融危機以來,抑制通貨膨脹成為俄羅斯中央銀行的主要目標。在國際能源價格居高不下的情況下,油元持續湧入俄國,貨幣供給量也節節上揚,因而造成通貨膨脹的壓力。在盧布匯價走揚,油價上升趨緩,最低工資調升等政策的交錯影響下,俄羅斯央行抑制通貨膨脹的政策難度更高,勢必使得俄央行加大貨幣政策的強度。根據俄羅斯中央銀行以往的操作經驗,控制貨幣總量 (M2) 的方式依舊是俄國的主要政策手段。具體的政策工具大致包括:貨幣市場與公債市場的積極沖銷,利用穩定基金吸收財政盈餘,緊縮對俄羅斯各級政府與銀行業的信用;而受限於金融市場尚未健全,公開市場操作工具依然扮演次要的角色。透過VAR/VECM檢驗公開市場操作工具影響貨幣政策操作目標的因果關係,本文發現CBR貨幣操作工具對其操作目標間的影響力相當有限。
    Containing inflation has become the main objective of Central Bank of Russia (CBR) since the 1998 financial crisis. Following high energy prices in recent years, the increased influx of petrodollars has resulted in inflationary pressure. Under the interweaving influence of other factors, such as the steady appreciation of Russian Ruble, the slow but continuing rise in oil prices, and the minimum wage policy, curbing inflation has became a more complicated task for CBR. According to the past experience of CBR, controlling the growth of money supply (M2) remains the major monetary policies. Some specific policies include sterilized intervention in money and bond markets, the use of stabilization fund to absorb fiscal surpluses, and the tightening credits issued to all-level governments and banking sectors. However, due to the lack of efficient financial markets, open market operations still play a minor role. The paper uses VAR/VECM to test the causality between open market tools and their objectives, and proves the limited influence of the market tools on their objectives.
    Relation: 俄羅斯學報, 9, 81-120
    Journal of Russian studies
    Vestnik instituta rossii
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    9(p81-120).pdf554KbAdobe PDF573View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback