English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 74911/106084 (71%)
造訪人次 : 19412871      線上人數 : 370
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 政大學報 > 第84期 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/102349
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102349


    題名: 量價分離評估與現行公告土地現值評價方式之比較分析
    其他題名: A Comparative Study of Segregation Assessment and Official Land Values Assessement
    作者: 陳奉瑤
    Chen, Fung-Yiao
    貢獻者: 地政系
    關鍵詞: 公告土地現值;評估比值;量價分離評價;標準宗地
    Official Land Value;Assessment Ratio
    日期: 2002-07
    上傳時間: 2016-09-29 17:36:03 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 公告土地現值為課徵土地增值稅的主要參考依據,其評估結果遭到諸多質疑,藉由相關文獻本文將其歸納為公平性與效率性二方面的問題。前者導因於垂直不公平稅賦,後者則來自市場交易價格的落差。針對此等缺失,部分文獻傾向以迴歸分析法分離影響地價因素,藉以作為短時間內查定人量土地價格的方式,然而受限於台灣土地交易價格與收益價格高度偏離的特性,恐有將非理性因素納入考量之疑慮,因而本文提出量價分離評估理念,並據以評估公告土地現值。本文藉由評估比值(assessment ratio)作為比較分析的工具,以不同價值土地之評估比率是否相等,檢視評價結果的公平性;以評估價格與市場交易價格比率接近一的程度,判斷其效率性。在市場交易價格合理可信的假設前提下,研究發現,以台南市安南區為例,藉由此方式評定公告土地現值,雖無法改善公平性問題,但卻可有效提高評價的效率性。
    The Official Land Value is the basis for the levying of Land Value Increment Tax in Taiwan. The assessed results of Official Land Value are always criticized. This paper, based upon literature review, argued those there exit equity and efficiency problems in current Official Land Value system. The former is resulted in the vertical inequity and the latter is caused from the gap between market price and Official Land Value. In order to solve these problems, some papers argued that the assessment of Official Land Value should use multi-regression method so as to know the factors, which influence the land price. However, in Taiwan, there exits a big gap between market and income value. Based upon the equity and efficiency viewpoint, this paper applies the concept of Segregation in Quantity and Value (SQV) to replace current Official Land Value method. Moreover, an empirical study, which adopts assessment ratio concept to examine the assessed results in order to judge the efficiency of both SQV and Official Land Value assessment, has been conducted. The results show there exists inequity on both methods. However, from the efficiency viewpoint, the method of SQV is much better than the current Official Land Value method.
    關聯: 國立政治大學學報, 84, 95-118
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[第84期] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    fb160923112840.pdf1985KbAdobe PDF251檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋