English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 75046/106105 (71%)
造訪人次 : 19443823      線上人數 : 435
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/112850
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112850


    題名: 關係人交易對公司租稅規避之影響: 以台灣上市電子業為例
    The Effect of Related Party Transaction to Tax Avoidance: the Case of Taiwan Public Electronic Company
    作者: 游竣淵
    貢獻者: 何怡澄
    游竣淵
    關鍵詞: 租稅規避
    關係人交易
    關係人類型
    Tax avoidance
    Related party transactions
    Related party types
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2017-09-13 16:53:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近來反避稅浪潮興起,促使各界再度檢視公司租稅規避的行為。關係人交易不透明且複雜的特性,常被公司用以進行不當的利益安排,達到減輕稅負的目的。本研究採用台灣上市電子業公司2013-2014年的關係人交易資料,探討關係人交易與租稅規避的關聯性。本研究將關係人交易類型分成簡單與複雜兩種類型。並將關係人分為關係個人、關係個體,更進一步將關係個體分為其他關係個體及集團企業型態。實證結果顯示公司與其他關係個體進行簡單交易時,稅規避程度較高。可以推論公司與不同關係人進行不同交易類型的避稅效果不同。
    Due to the emerging of anti-tax avoidance, the act of companies arranging tax avoidance is being examined. Related party transaction is complicated and nontransparent, therefore companies often use it to undergo inappropriate interest arrangement to ease tax burden. This research examines the related party transactions of Taiwan public electronic companies from 2013 to 2014 to study the relationship between related party transaction and tax avoidance. This research divides transactions into two types, simple and complicated. Related parties are divided into individual and enterprise, and enterprise are further divided into other related enterprise and conglomerate. Research shows higher tax avoidance when companies adopt simple transaction with other related enterprise. In solution this research infers tax avoidance effects will differ when types of transactions and related parties are different.
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻:
    王建煊與吳家勳 (2012),租稅法,台北:華泰文化。
    馬嘉應與賴榮舟 (2013),關係公司間財務安排移轉訂價議題之探討,財稅研究,台北:財稅研究雜誌社。(27 p.23-33)
    陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,(34):57-75。
    ———,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,22(1):127-151。
    陳明進與蔡麗雯 (2006),稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,23(6):739-763。
    曾柏維 (2015),集團企業交易與租稅規避之關聯性研究,國立政治大學財政學研究所,未發表之碩士論文。
    黃美祝與楊佩璇 (2011),集團企業與非避稅程度之比較,會計學報,4(1):1-22 。
    葛克昌 (1977),租稅規避之研究,國立臺灣大學法論叢,6(2):167-187 。
    英文參考文獻:
    Austin, C. R., and R. J. Wilson. 2013. Are reputational costs a determinant of tax avoidance? Paper presented at 2013 American Taxation Association Midyear Meeting: Tax Avoidance in an International Setting.
    Bae, K. H., J. K. Kang, and J. M. Kim. 2002. Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. The Journal of Finance 57 (6): 2695-2740.
    Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95 (1): 41-61.
    Cheung, Y.-L., Y. Qi, P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2009. Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (5): 914-924.
    Cheung, Y.-L., P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2006. Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82 (2): 343-386.
    Chyz, J. A. 2013. Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Accounting and Economics 56 (2-3): 311-328.
    Clausing, K. A. 2009. Multinational firm tax avoidance and tax policy. National Tax Journal 62(4): 703-725
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (1): 145-179.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2009a. Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (3): 537-546.
    ———. 2009b. Earnings management, corporate tax shelters, and book-tax alignment. National Tax Journal: 169-186.
    Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics 88 (3): 430-465.
    Dyreng, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2008. Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review 83 (1): 61-82.
    Erickson, M., B. W. Mayhew, and W. L. Felix. 2000. Why do audits fail? Evidence from Lincoln Savings and Loan. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (1): 165-194.
    Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego. 2009. Tax Reporting Aggressiveness and Its Relation to Aggressive Financial Reporting. The Accounting Review 84 (2): 467-496.
    Graham, J. R., and A. L. Tucker. 2006. Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics 81 (3): 563-594.
    Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman. 2010. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3): 127-178.
    Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod. 2009. What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics 93 (1-2): 126-141.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Khurana, I. K., and W. J. Moser. 2013. Institutional Shareholders' Investment Horizons and Tax Avoidance. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 35 (1): 111-134.
    Kohlbeck, M., and B. W. Mayhew. 2010. Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29 (2):115-137.
    Lanis, R., and G. Richardson. 2011. The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30 (1): 50-70.
    Manzon Jr, G. B., and G. A. Plesko. 2002. The Relation between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income. The Tax Law Review 55: 175.
    Mills, L. F. 1998. Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (2): 343-356.
    Phillips, J. D. 2003. Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 847-874.
    Rego, S. O. 2003. Tax‐Avoidance Activities of US Multinational Corporations*. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (4): 805-833.
    Swartz, M. and S. Watkins, 2003, Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Enron, New York, NY, Doubleday.
    Swenson, D. L. 2001. Tax reforms and evidence of transfer pricing. National Tax Journal 54(1): 7-25.
    Wilson, R. J. 2009. An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 969-999.
    Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu, and Y. H. Su. 2012. Related-party transactions and corporate governance: The evidence from the Taiwan stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 20 (5): 755-776.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353113
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1033531131
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋