English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23494699      Online Users : 122
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/114779
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114779


    Title: 核閱方式與核閱者立場對查核績效之影響
    The Effect of Review Mode and Reviewer Preference on Auditors' Performance
    Authors: 杜榮瑞
    林靖傑
    廖容翎
    Duh, Rong-Ruey
    Lin, Ching-Chieh
    Keywords: 解釋責任;核閱方式;核閱者立場;查核績效
    Accountability;Review mode;Reviewer preference;Auditor performance
    Date: 2016-07
    Issue Date: 2017-11-15 16:00:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討查核過程中,核閱方式與核閱者立場等兩種解釋責任對查核績效的聯合影響,是否查核人員在電子核閱下能減少其策略性行為。經以78 位查核人員實驗後發現,在面對面核閱下,若受試者主管傾向懷疑客戶解釋,相對於主管傾向信任客戶,受試者對於應收帳款餘額評以較低程度允當表達,此種策略性態度移轉在電子核閱下並未減輕。此外,在面對面核閱下,懷疑組的受試者比信任組搜尋更多反向(更少正向)的查核證據,在電子核閱下,正向與反向證據量差距縮小。本文認為,核閱方式在查核人員傾向主管立場的行為中,具調節效果,但此調節效果僅存在於過程而非結果的解釋責任。
    This study examines the joint effect on auditor performance of two accountability features in the audit review process: review mode and reviewer preference. It investigates whether the auditors' strategic behavior can be mitigated under the e-mail review mode. Seventy-eight auditors participated in an experiment. Results suggest that, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors whose supervisors are known to be skeptical about client-provided explanations make lower likelihood assessment that the explanations can substantially account for the fluctuation of accounts receivable balance than auditors whose supervisors are known to trust the client-provided explanations. Such attitudinal shift is not reduced under the e-mail review mode. In addition, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors in the skeptical condition search for more opposing (less supporting) audit evidence than those in the credence condition. However, such differences diminish under the e-mail review mode. Our finding suggests that auditors' conformity to the reviewer preference can be moderated by review mode for process accountability but not outcome accountability.
    Relation: 會計評論, 63, 47-76
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    63-2.pdf473KbAdobe PDF144View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback