English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23483044      Online Users : 260
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/114787
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114787


    Title: 成長機會對初次上市股票定價與價格行為之影響
    The Influence of Growth Opportunities on the Pricing and Price Behavior of IPOs
    Authors: 洪振虔
    吳貞和
    張力
    Hung, Chen-Chien
    Wu, Chen-Ho
    Chang, Li
    Keywords: 市價淨值比;上市初期報酬;價格行為;成長機會
    Market-To-Book Ratio;Initial Return;Price Behavior;Growth Opportunity
    Date: 2017-07
    Issue Date: 2017-11-15 16:02:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 就新上市公司而言,成長機會不僅是發行價與上市初期股票市價重要的決定因素,亦與上市後的長期價格績效有關。本研究實證發現,新上市公司經由相對於當期基本價值的偏低訂定發行價,以傳遞其成長機會的訊息,而成長機會也確實與長期價格績效有正的顯著關聯;然而,投資者對較高成長機會的初次上市股票有超額需求,促使上市初期市場被過高評價,而市場對錯誤評價的修正,不利於長期價格績效表現。另外,證據顯示相對於真實價值,普遍存在發行公司偏高訂定發行價與上市初期投資者樂觀偏高評價的現象,可見以上市初期報酬率作為上市股票定價偏低程度之衡量是有待商榷的作法。
    For IPOs, growth opportunities are not only a determining factor in the offer price and the initial market price, but also on long-term price performance after the offerings. In this study, we find that the difference between IPO offer price and current fundamental value is a signal for growth opportunities, which in turn are positively correlated with the long-term price performance. However, growth opportunities appear to lead to excessive demand for IPOs to promote optimistic valuation after market, but the market correction of the overpricing is not conducive to long-term price performance. In addition, the evidence shows that IPOs are systematically overvalued at the offer price and the subsequent price relative to true value; therefore, employing the initial return as a measure of underpricing is problematic.
    Relation: 會計評論, 65, 45-81
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.2017.65.2
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.2017.65.2
    Appears in Collections:[International Journal of Accounting Studies] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    65-2.pdf653KbAdobe PDF252View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback