English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 75046/106105 (71%)
造訪人次 : 19446218      線上人數 : 427
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36228


    題名: The Case Study OF A Global Computer Company Bulding AND Managing Dynamic CapabilIties
    The Case Study OF A Global Computer Company Bulding AND Managing Dynamic CapabilIties
    作者: 周哲毅
    Chow, Tso-Yi
    貢獻者: 吳豐祥
    周哲毅
    Chow, Tso-Yi
    關鍵詞: Dynamic Capability
    Core Competency
    New Business Development
    ODM Management
    Supply Chain
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 17:38:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: PC industry is a highly competitive industry. In this fast changing environment,
    no company can simply rely on basic core competencies to stay-up with the
    market & competitions. The growth of global demand for PCs has reached a
    plateau in recent years, and as products are becoming commoditized the
    differentiation between products are hardly distinguishable. And price war is
    inevitable.
    This study investigated how does a global computer company build and manage
    its dynamic capabilities to stay competitive and make appropriate adjustment to
    leverage its dynamic capabilities in the new business. The study finds that in
    order to sustain competitiveness in the market, corporation needs to look inward
    and institute a process to manage product and service development and business
    risks. Having good products and customer relationship are just the starting
    point for a successful business. A continuous learning system can help
    company to constantly strive for better improvement and in a long run this
    becomes a strong driving factor to improve operation excellence. It takes
    persistent and relentless drive for improvement to make a good company to
    great.
    When a company is going to start a new business and break an existing model,
    one of the effective approaches is to form a special task team that is given the
    full ownership in making sure the project is successful. In addition, senior
    management team needs to work closely with the project team via regular
    meetings and to offer help in clearing roadblocks within the organization and
    allowing team to think out-of-box and propose necessary changes. Without
    management support and foster, the chance of success for the special task team is
    minimal.
    PC industry is a highly competitive industry. In this fast changing environment,
    no company can simply rely on basic core competencies to stay-up with the
    market & competitions. The growth of global demand for PCs has reached a
    plateau in recent years, and as products are becoming commoditized the
    differentiation between products are hardly distinguishable. And price war is
    inevitable.
    This study investigated how does a global computer company build and manage
    its dynamic capabilities to stay competitive and make appropriate adjustment to
    leverage its dynamic capabilities in the new business. The study finds that in
    order to sustain competitiveness in the market, corporation needs to look inward
    and institute a process to manage product and service development and business
    risks. Having good products and customer relationship are just the starting
    point for a successful business. A continuous learning system can help
    company to constantly strive for better improvement and in a long run this
    becomes a strong driving factor to improve operation excellence. It takes
    persistent and relentless drive for improvement to make a good company to
    great.
    When a company is going to start a new business and break an existing model,
    one of the effective approaches is to form a special task team that is given the
    full ownership in making sure the project is successful. In addition, senior
    management team needs to work closely with the project team via regular
    meetings and to offer help in clearing roadblocks within the organization and
    allowing team to think out-of-box and propose necessary changes. Without
    management support and foster, the chance of success for the special task team is
    minimal.
    Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
    LIST OF FIGURES 6
    LIST OF TABLES 8
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 9
    1.1. MOTIVATION 9
    1.2. OBJECTIVE AND INVESTIGATION 10
    1.2.1 Thesis Objective 10
    1.2.2 Investigation 10
    CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 12
    CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 18
    3.1. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 18
    3.2. METHODOLOGY AND SOURCE OF INFORMATION 19
    3.3. RESEARCH LIMITATION 19
    CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY 20
    4.1. INTRODUCTION ON COMPANY X 20
    4.2. COMPANY X’S DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES 23
    4.3. PROCESS 24
    4.3.1 Coordination: 24
    4.3.2 Learning 27
    4.3.3 Reconfiguration 28
    4.4. POSITION 28
    4.4.1 Technological Asset 28
    4.4.2 Complementary Asset 35
    4.4.3 Market Asset 39
    4.4.4 Financial Asset 40
    4.4.5 Structural Asset 42
    4.4.6 Organization Boundaries 44
    4.4.7 Reputational Asset 46
    4.5. PATH 53
    4.5.1 Looking for opportunity 53
    4.5.2 Challenges to enter the new market 58
    4.5.3 Alternative Strategy: 59
    CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH FINDINGS 67
    CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 72
    6.1. CONCLUSION 72
    6.2. IMPLICATION 74
    6.3. SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES 75
    GLOSSARY 76
    REFERENCE 78
    CHINESE LITERATURE 78
    ENGLISH LITERATURE 79
    參考文獻: 1. Ansoff, H. I.(1965), Corporate Strategy-An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    2. Biggadike, H. R.(1979), “The Risky Business of Diversification”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp.103-111.
    3. Bakker, H., Jones, W. and Nichols, M.(1994), “Using Core Competences to Develop New Business”, Long Range Planning, Vol.27, No.6, pp.13-27.
    4. Briody, D. and Moskowitz, E. (2001), “Dell: the antitechnology company”, Red Herring Magazine
    5. Dell, M. (1999), Direct from Dell Strategies That Revolutionized an Industry, Harper Business
    6. Fichthorn, L. and Su, C. (2001), Dell Computer Corporation, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
    7. Gallon, M. R., Stillman, H. M. and Coates, D.(1995), “Putting Core Competency thinking into Practice,” Research Technology Management, May-June, pp.20-28.
    8. Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y. B. and Malak N.(2002), “Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Structured Methodology for Identifying Core Competence,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 49, No.1, Feb, pp.28-35.
    9. Kuaunoki k., Nonaka I. & Nagata A., ( 1998 ) “Organizational Capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol.9, No.6
    10. Killing, J. P.(1978), “Diversification through Licensing”, R&D Management, June, pp.159-163.
    11. Leonard-Barton D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.111-125.
    12. Leonard-Barton D., (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
    13. Long, C. & Vickers-koch, M.(1995), “Using Core Capabilities to Create Competitive Advantage”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.24, No.1, summer, pp.6-22.
    14. Mascarenhas, B., Baveja, A. & Jamil, M.,( 1998 ), “Dynamics of Core Competencies in Leading Multinational Companies”, California Management Review, Vol.40, No.4, Summer,1998
    15. Nakoka, I. & Takeuchi, H. ( 1995 ). The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York:Oxford University Press
    16. Ng, P. ( 2000 ), “Dell: Selling Directly, Globally”, Centre for Asian Business Cases, The University of Hong Kong
    17. Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G.(1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp.79-91.
    18. Roberts, E. B. & Berry, C. A.(1985), “Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies for Success”, Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp.3-17.
    19. Ryans, A. and Vandenbosch M. ( 2000 ), “Compaq Computer Corporation: The Dell Challenge”, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario
    20. TBR Corporate IT Buying Behavior & Customer Satisfaction Study: Notebooks First Quarter 2005
    21. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7, pp.509-533.
    22. Teece, D. J. and Gray P., (1994), “The Dynamic of Firms:An Introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3):537-556
    23. Teece, D. J., (1996), “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31:193-224
    24. Teece, D. J., Gray P., and Shuen, A., (1997), “The Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18:7, 509-533
    25. Thomke, S. ( 1998 ), “Product Development at Dell Computer Corporation”, Harvard Business School
    26. Tripsas M.( 1997 ), “Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability: Evidence from the Typesetter Industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.6 No.2, March 1997
    27. von Hippel, E. ( 1998 ), "Economics of product Development by users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information", Management Science , 44(5), pp. 629-644.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    88931034
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088931034
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML342檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋