English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71578/104447 (69%)
造訪人次 : 19155702      線上人數 : 389
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77328


    題名: 從幻幕到真實: 一步步走向內在孩童的自我敘說歷程
    From illusion to real: the self-narrative process of marching forward to inner child
    作者: 陳雪如
    Chen, Hsueh Ju
    貢獻者: 修慧蘭
    陳雪如
    Chen, Hsueh Ju
    關鍵詞: 自我敘說
    內在小孩
    復原歷程
    實習諮商心理師
    self-narrative
    inner child
    recovering process
    intern counselor
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2015-08-03 13:46:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文以自我敘說的方式探索生命經驗,呈現我如何在與創傷的關係中,那種無法解決痛苦的痛苦中,一步步地幫助自己從幻幕到真實。在這樣的歷程中,學習如何在信任與不信任關係中苦苦掙扎,冒險敞開自己的心,努力學習與他人「分享」脆弱與羞愧,學習向外尋求支持與幫助。同時,對內,則很努力地修復與自己疏遠的關係,學習當個我想成為的好媽媽,傾聽我內在小孩的需求。

    我的歷程,並非直線性地一步步從幻幕走向真實,而是在虛幻與真實間、在遺棄與接觸內在孩童間不斷來來回回,緩慢螺旋向下的歷程。最終,成人的我,帶著害怕關係斷裂的恐懼、因照顧自己而產生的罪惡感,仍願意為了我的內在小孩,採取行動照顧她的需求,維護自己的界限,讓內在小孩在這過程中,經驗到自己的價值。進而承諾自己,不再遺棄我的內在小孩。希望我的經歷,能夠對與我有類似經歷的人有幫助、能夠讓諮商師對這類型的個案有更深的理解。

    在我往內走向真實的歷程中,我同時身為實習諮商心理師,我不只接受諮商與治療,我也在諮商、治療別人,同時,我也在接受督導,督導象徵權威,我也在處理我與權威間的關係,我們彼此間的議題,都會互相碰撞影響。有時候,我的議題會影響我諮商個案,尤其當我身為新手治療師,對自己有很高的期望,當我看到自己還過不去的議題影響到諮商時,我也會對自己又氣又急可又很無奈,也曾因此懷疑過自己是否適合當個諮商師。可是慢慢地,我開始接納自己的狀態、接納自己也是個人,不是個完美的諮商師,當我對自己有愈多接納跟允許時,我也對個案有更多的涵容,希望我的經歷能對其他實務工作者能夠有所助益。
    This thesis explored life experience of the author, presented how the author overcame the trauma and marched forward to the real from illusion by self-narrative process. In the process of recovering, I learned how to make balance when struggling in the relationship of believing and unbelieving, open my mind to others, share the vulnerable and shame and ask for help. At the same time, from the inside of my heart, the cold and detached relationship to the inner child was gradually rebuilt and a good-enough-mother who was able to listen to the needs of inner child was formed.
    The process of the recovering was not straightly going from illusion to real but moving back and forth between the illusion and real, and the abandon and contact inner child, again, again, and again. Finally, the adult part of me overcame the fear of broken relationship and the guilty of taking care of myself to care for the needs of inner child and establish the boundary between me and others. The inner child experienced the self-value in this process. Moreover, a promise for not abandoning the inner child again was established firmly by the adult.
    As the process of going to real, I was both a client and an intern counselor; besides, I was supervised. The supervisor symbolized the authority; therefore, I was also dealing with the authority issue. The issue between me and the authority also influence both of us. Sometimes, my issue also influenced my clients, especially when I was a freshman who had high expectation to herself. When the issue that was not yet been overcome effected the counseling, I was mad and disappointed at myself. Step by step, in the processing of recovery, I started to accept that situation and accept that I was also a human and an imperfect counselor. With the increasing acceptance, I contained my clients more. I hope my experience may be able help the client who had the same experience and help the counselor to understand the client deeply.
    參考文獻: 英文參考文獻
    Arendt, H. (1985). The human condition (p. 175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bruner, J. (1985). Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing (pp. 97–115). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
    Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bruner, J. S. (1992). The narrative construction of reality. In H. Beilin & P. Pufall. (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 229-250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry : Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-bass press.
    Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & E. Gergen (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Denzin, N.K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Denzin & L. Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Gergen, K. J., & Davis, K. E. (1985). The social construction of the person. New York: Springer - Verlag.
    Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 17–56). San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.
    Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self : Beyond individualism and ratioinalism. Americna Psychologist, 47(1), 23–33.
    Lieblich, A., Tuvai-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Peller, G. (1987). Reason and the mob: The politics of representation. Tikuun, 2, 28–95.
    Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
    Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talk: Women and men make sense of personal relationship. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
    Rosenwald, G. C., & Ochberg, R. L. (1992). Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding. (G. C. Rosenwald & R. L. Ochberg, Eds.) (p. 1). Yale University Press.
    Runyan, W. M. (1990). Individual lives and the structure of personality psychology. In A. I. Rabin, R. A. Zucker, R. A. Emmons, & S. Frank (Eds.), Studying persons and lives. New York: Springer.
    Schafer, R. (1981). Narration in the psychoanalytic dialogue. In W. J. Thomas (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 25–49). Mitchell, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Schank, C. R. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
    Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Norton & Company.
    Tierney, W. G. (1997). Lost in translation: Time and voice qualitative research. In W. G. Tierney & Lincoln. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 23–36). Albany, New York.
    White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Injury, 7(1), 5–27.
    中文參考文獻
    王勇智、鄧明宇(譯)(2003)。敘說分析。(原作者:C. Kohler Riessman)。台北:五南(原著出版年:1993)。
    何奧東(2005)。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55–72。
    李有成(1990)。論自傳。當代,55,20–29。
    李美玲(2006)。創傷與復原─以桃莉‧海頓作品為例(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立台東大學,台東縣。
    吳謦竹(譯)(2015)。重新學會愛:在傷痛中自我修復,創造幸福。(原作者:
    Boris Cyrulnik)。台北市:心靈工坊。
    邱惟真(1996)。朱光潛自我之建構:一種敘說式研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 私立輔仁大學,新北市。
    洪瑞斌(2010)。組織的多重真實性:一個組織諮詢案例的敘事性反思。應用心理研究,47,41–88。
    洪瑞斌(2012)。 向大海進軍:以李安的生命敘說反思成年男性的轉化之道。第一屆海峽兩岸「生命述說與心理傳記學」學術研討會。龍華科技大學主辦,輔仁大學、湛江師範學院協辦。桃園:龍華科技大學。
    洪瑞斌、陳筱婷、莊騏嘉(2012)。自我敘說研究中的真實與真理:兼論自我敘說研究之品質參照標準。應用心理研究,56,19–53。
    高敬文(2002)。質化研究方法論。台北:師大書苑。
    陳冠妏(2003)。怒放自書與自療關係初探(未出版之碩士論文)。私立輔仁大學,新北市。
    傅佩榮(1992)。從自我出發。台北:書評書目雜誌社。.
    傅湘雯(譯)(1994)。回歸內在:與你的內在小孩對話。(原作者:約翰•布雷蕭)。台北市:月旦。
    傅國倫(譯)(2014)。愛,從接納自己開始:發現愛,深入關係,到與萬物合一的旅程。(原作者: 巴觀)。台北市:新星球。
    楊明磊(2002)。內在小孩治療法。諮商與輔導。201。28-34。
    蔡婷婷(2013)。拖出塵封的抽屜,揚起失落的記憶—父女關係之自我敘說(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北教育大學,台北市。
    賴佩霞(2012)。回家。台北:早安財經。
    賴誠斌、丁興祥(2005)。自我書寫與生命創化:以蘆荻社大學員蕃薯的故事為 例。應用心理學研究,25,73–114。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    輔導與諮商碩士學位學程(MPCG)
    101172005
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1011720051
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[輔導與諮商碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋