English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 73593/105225 (70%)
造訪人次 : 19286656      線上人數 : 559
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80424


    題名: 中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗之編製
    其他題名: The Development of Radical Remote Associates Test
    作者: 吳哲源;Wu, Jhe Yuan
    張雨霖;Chang, Yu Lin
    陳學志;Chen, Hsueh Chih
    貢獻者: 國立政治大學邁向頂尖大學計畫創新研究團隊
    關鍵詞: 遠距聯想;中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗;頓悟性思考
    remote association;radical remote associates test;insight thinking
    日期: 2014-11-15
    上傳時間: 2016-01-06 10:57:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究擬發展《中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗》(Radical Remote Associates Test, RRAT)。測驗編製首先挑選出60組具有同樣的部件之三個衍生字組,編成預試題本計60題。接著以196名大學生進行預試,依項目分析結果挑選出30題做為正式試題,並區分為難度、鑑別度相近的甲、乙兩式題本(各15題)。其次甲式以173名、乙式以187名大學生進行正式施測及信效度研究。結果在信度方面,甲、乙兩版本內部一致性係數分別為.706與.685;在效度方面,兩版本皆與「中文遠距聯想測驗」、「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」、「頓悟性問題測驗」有顯著正相關存在。另與「新編創造思考測驗」各指標皆無相關存在,顯示本測驗具有良好的聚斂效度與區辨效度。
    The purpose of this study was to develop “Radical Remote Associates Test” (RRAT). To develop RRAT, the researcher first formed a 60-item pretest by choosing sixty radicals and their three derivative characters, and deleted the same component of derivative characters. This pretest was administrated to 196 college students, and 30 items of the pretest were selected as formal scale according to the item analysis of preparing research. The researcher then divided these items into two versions, version A and B, with the same difficulty and discrimination, and each of them included 15 questions. Next, the formal scale, including version A and B, was distributed to college students, and 173 (version A) and 187 (version B) data were collected respectively. As to reliability, the coefficient of internal consistency of the two RRAT versions was .706 and .685 each. As to validity, each of the two versions of RRAT was significantly positively correlated with “Chinese Remote Associates Test”, “Chinese Word Remote Associates Test”, and “Insight Problems”. Besides, the two RRAT versions and all the index of “New Creativity Test” had no significant correlation, demonstrating the good Convergent validity and discriminant validity of RRAT.
    關聯: 創新研究國際學術研討會
    主辦單位:國立政治大學邁向頂尖大學計畫創新研究團隊
    舉辦日期:2014.11.15-2014.11.16
    資料類型: conference
    顯示於類別:[2014創新研究國際學術研討會] 會議論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML398檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋