English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71578/104447 (69%)
造訪人次 : 19170076      線上人數 : 709
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97782


    題名: 強權敵對關係對東亞區域主義之影響
    其他題名: Implications of Great Power Rivalries on Regionalism in East Asia
    作者: 周志杰
    Chou, Chih-Chieh
    關鍵詞: 東亞;區域主義;敵對關係;美中日關係;東南亞國協;區域安全
    East Asia;regionalism;rivalry;USA-China-Japan relations;ASEAN;regional security
    日期: 2007-06
    上傳時間: 2016-06-08 11:44:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 冷戰後東亞區域主義的發展迅速,但其深化程度仍深受區域強權之間敵對關係遺緒的影響。本文藉分析近來美、中、日三國的互動以及東協的對策,勾勒出政治敵對影響東亞區域主義發展的動因及途徑。首先,美國的單邊主義、中國崛起與日本因「正常化」而漸右傾之外交策略,使原即因意識形態、區域安全觀、相互投射的認知與權力競逐等歧異,而影響三者實質合作以深化區域制度的可能性更低。其次,小國不會因強權間的敵對與競爭而往任一方靠攏,反而促其更重視區域多邊制度及其效用。尤其是東協加三與東亞高峰會進程的發展,強化小國集體合作對大國的議價能力。第三,小國仍選擇性地在群體合作與個別利益間尋求平衡。故東協的存續即植基於不強迫其成員在制度化與國家利益之間作選擇。最後,三強權外交戰略操作的方向,將持續影響區域主義的發展,無論導向匯合深化或更加分歧。
    The development of regionalism in East Asia has speeded up in post-Cold War era. Nevertheless, it is limited by the legacy of political rivalry among the great regional powers. This paper intends to examine causality between such rivalries and regionalism by focusing on USA-China-Japan interactions and ASEAN’s response, in order to explain why and how does rivalries affect the prospects for regionalism. First, the development of effective regional institutionalism is precluded by ideological differences, security tensions, mutual suspicion and geopolitical competition between the three powers. These rivalries have been exacerbated by American unilateralism, China’s radical emergence, and Japan’s redirection for a more prominent international role. Second, tension and competition between three powers, by contrast, does not mean that the region can be divided into their spheres of influence. Conversely, it has created a resurgence in the efficacy and appeal of regional institutions. As the ASEAN Plus Three and the East Asian Summit processes grow, the ASEAN states’ bargaining power in dealing with great powers is greatly enhanced within their collaborative institutions. Intriguingly, third, the ASEAN states may work competitive pressures to their own advantage by overriding their cooperative inclinations. ASEAN has proven to be durable, but never been able to risk pushing its members in choosing between institutional effectiveness and individual state interest. Finally, any further differences in how three great powers conduct their foreign strategies will cause intra- regional cooperation to converge or diverge as time progresses.
    關聯: 中山人文社會期刊, 15(1),27-69
    Dr. Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[中山人文社會科學期刊] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    15(1)p27-69.pdf323KbAdobe PDF118檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋